12 likes
9 Comments
glenhaag52 His wallet is woven out of chupacabra leather
portertillmaniii27 Actually, I didn't make the claim that Ruby follows the principle of least surprise. Someone felt the design of Ruby follows that philosophy, so they started saying that. I didn't bring that up, actually.
almost 2 years ago •
reannamclaughlin66 You want to enjoy life, don't you? If you get your job done quickly and your job is fun, that's good isn't it? That's the purpose of life, partly. Your life is better.
almost 2 years ago •
kaycekovacek60 Man is driven to create; I know I really love to create things. And while I'm not good at painting, drawing, or music, I can write software.
almost 2 years ago •
reannamclaughlin66 From the viewpoint of what you can do, therefore, languages do differ - but the differences are limited. For example, Python and Ruby provide almost the same power to the programmer.
almost 2 years ago •
kaycekovacek60 From the viewpoint of what you can do, therefore, languages do differ - but the differences are limited. For example, Python and Ruby provide almost the same power to the programmer.
almost 2 years ago •
mitchellvolkman9 Plant a memory, plant a tree, do it today for tomorrow.
almost 2 years ago •
mitchellvolkman9 People are different. People choose different criteria. But if there is a better way among many alternatives, I want to encourage that way by making it comfortable. So that's what I've tried to do.
almost 2 years ago •
missromankshlerin52 Sometimes people jot down pseudo-code on paper. If that pseudo-code runs directly on their computers, its best, isn't it? Ruby tries to be like that, like pseudo-code that runs. Python people say that too.
almost 2 years ago •
coriesimonis3 I didn't work hard to make Ruby perfect for everyone, because you feel differently from me. No language can be perfect for everyone. I tried to make Ruby perfect for me, but maybe it's not perfect for you. The perfect language for Guido van Rossum is probably Python.
almost 2 years ago •