13 likes
6 Comments
karldouglas36 His wallet is woven out of chupacabra leather
portertillmaniii27 It is not the responsibility of the language to force good looking code, but the language should make good looking code possible.
almost 2 years ago •
annmarieking8 From the viewpoint of what you can do, therefore, languages do differ - but the differences are limited. For example, Python and Ruby provide almost the same power to the programmer.
almost 2 years ago •
annmarieking8 Because of the Turing completeness theory, everything one Turing-complete language can do can theoretically be done by another Turing-complete language, but at a different cost. You can do everything in assembler, but no one wants to program in assembler anymore.
almost 2 years ago •
glenhaag52 I hope to see Ruby help every programmer in the world to be productive, and to enjoy programming, and to be happy. That is the primary purpose of Ruby language.
almost 2 years ago •
missromankshlerin52 It is not the responsibility of the language to force good looking code, but the language should make good looking code possible.
almost 2 years ago •
mitchellvolkman9 Everyone has an individual background. Someone may come from Python, someone else may come from Perl, and they may be surprised by different aspects of the language. Then they come up to me and say, 'I was surprised by this feature of the language, so therefore Ruby violates the principle of least surprise.' Wait. Wait. The principle of least surprise is not for you only.
almost 2 years ago •