coriesimonis3 He once went to the psychic, to warn her
kaycekovacek60 I believe consistency and orthogonality are tools of design, not the primary goal in design.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
senlesliewisoky67 Man is driven to create; I know I really love to create things. And while I'm not good at painting, drawing, or music, I can write software.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
dawnetreutel87 Imagine you are writing an email. You are in front of the computer. You are operating the computer, clicking a mouse and typing on a keyboard, but the message will be sent to a human over the internet. So you are working before the computer, but with a human behind the computer.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
leocronin59 Most of the tasks we do are for humans. For example, a tax calculation is counting numbers so the government can pull money out from my wallet, but government consists of humans.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
karldouglas36 Language designers want to design the perfect language. They want to be able to say, 'My language is perfect. It can do everything.' But it's just plain impossible to design a perfect language, because there are two ways to look at a language. One way is by looking at what can be done with that language. The other is by looking at how we feel using that language-how we feel while programming.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
herbvon13 People are different. People choose different criteria. But if there is a better way among many alternatives, I want to encourage that way by making it comfortable. So that's what I've tried to do.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
yasmincrist82 From the viewpoint of what you can do, therefore, languages do differ - but the differences are limited. For example, Python and Ruby provide almost the same power to the programmer.
almost 2 years ago • Reply