coriesimonis3 He lives vicariously through himself
nathanielterry37 I hope to see Ruby help every programmer in the world to be productive, and to enjoy programming, and to be happy. That is the primary purpose of Ruby language.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
reannamclaughlin66 I believe consistency and orthogonality are tools of design, not the primary goal in design.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
mrsmaclindgren9 From the viewpoint of what you can do, therefore, languages do differ - but the differences are limited. For example, Python and Ruby provide almost the same power to the programmer.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
profsimonlangworth38 Most programs are not write-once. They are reworked and rewritten again and again in their lived. Bugs must be debugged. Changing requirements and the need for increased functionality mean the program itself may be modified on an ongoing basis. During this process, human beings must be able to read and understand the original code. It is therefore more important by far for humans to be able to understand the program than it is for the computer.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
kaycekovacek60 It is not the responsibility of the language to force good looking code, but the language should make good looking code possible.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
coriesimonis3 Everyone has an individual background. Someone may come from Python, someone else may come from Perl, and they may be surprised by different aspects of the language. Then they come up to me and say, 'I was surprised by this feature of the language, so therefore Ruby violates the principle of least surprise.' Wait. Wait. The principle of least surprise is not for you only.
almost 2 years ago • Reply
annmarieking8 Plant a memory, plant a tree, do it today for tomorrow.
almost 2 years ago • Reply