9 likes
6 Comments
glenhaag52 Cars look both ways for him, before driving down a street
dawnetreutel87 It is not the responsibility of the language to force good looking code, but the language should make good looking code possible.
almost 2 years ago •
mrsmaclindgren9 Sometimes people jot down pseudo-code on paper. If that pseudo-code runs directly on their computers, its best, isn't it? Ruby tries to be like that, like pseudo-code that runs. Python people say that too.
almost 2 years ago •
chucksawaynret86 You want to enjoy life, don't you? If you get your job done quickly and your job is fun, that's good isn't it? That's the purpose of life, partly. Your life is better.
almost 2 years ago •
dongklein22 People are different. People choose different criteria. But if there is a better way among many alternatives, I want to encourage that way by making it comfortable. So that's what I've tried to do.
almost 2 years ago •
chucksawaynret86 It is not the responsibility of the language to force good looking code, but the language should make good looking code possible.
almost 2 years ago •
murrayjones54 Language designers want to design the perfect language. They want to be able to say, 'My language is perfect. It can do everything.' But it's just plain impossible to design a perfect language, because there are two ways to look at a language. One way is by looking at what can be done with that language. The other is by looking at how we feel using that language-how we feel while programming.
almost 2 years ago •